002415.SZ vs 2628.HK — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 002415.SZ quality —/100 vs 2628.HK —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 002415.SZ (Hikvision) | 2628.HK (Tracker Fund of HK) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Security Tech | hk · ETF |
| Price | ¥35.31 | HK$29.10 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 273 bars · uPnL +34.6% | LONG · 310 bars · uPnL +80.7% |
| Total return | +29.8% | +80.7% |
Thesis-break template (Security Tech)
top-customer revenue contracting two straight quarters; sustained gross-margin compression; a rival commoditizing the core product; debt-funded buybacks
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "002415.SZ vs 2628.HK — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/002415.sz-vs-2628.hk · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice