002475.SZ vs CF — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 002475.SZ quality —/100 vs CF 100/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 002475.SZ (Luxshare Precision) | CF (CF Industries) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Electronics | us · Materials |
| Price | ¥56.79 | $125.71 |
| Quality score | —/100 | 100/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 290 bars · uPnL +73.6% | LONG · 311 bars · uPnL +35.2% |
| Total return | +73.6% | +35.2% |
Thesis-break template (Electronics)
core revenue contracting two quarters; margin premium eroding; net debt deteriorating; key-executive exits
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "002475.SZ vs CF — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/002475.sz-vs-cf · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice