003670.KS vs 601988.SS — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 003670.KS quality —/100 vs 601988.SS —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: yahoo | |
|---|---|---|
| 003670.KS (Poongsan) | 601988.SS (Bank of China) | |
| Market / sector | kr · Nonferrous Metals | ashare · Financials |
| Price | ₩183,900 | ¥6.17 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 8 bars · uPnL +7.9% | LONG · 289 bars · uPnL +13.5% |
| Total return | +12.1% | +13.5% |
Thesis-break template (Nonferrous Metals)
core revenue contracting two quarters; margin premium eroding; net debt deteriorating; key-executive exits
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "003670.KS vs 601988.SS — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/003670.ks-vs-601988.ss · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice