0939.HK vs 600030.SS — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 0939.HK quality —/100 vs 600030.SS —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 0939.HK (China Construction Bk) | 600030.SS (CITIC Securities) | |
| Market / sector | hk · Financials | ashare · Brokerage |
| Price | HK$9.11 | ¥27.88 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 312 bars · uPnL +29.6% | LONG · 89 bars · uPnL +7.7% |
| Total return | +29.6% | +9.0% |
Thesis-break template (Financials)
NPL deterioration beyond industry pace; NIM squeeze from deposit competition; regulation hitting core profit; growth from looser lending
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "0939.HK vs 600030.SS — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/0939.hk-vs-600030.ss · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice