1398.HK vs 601899.SS — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 1398.HK quality —/100 vs 601899.SS —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 1398.HK (ICBC) | 601899.SS (Zijin Mining A) | |
| Market / sector | hk · Financials | ashare · Metals |
| Price | HK$7.42 | ¥34.56 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 305 bars · uPnL +27.8% | LONG · 311 bars · uPnL +101.0% |
| Total return | +27.8% | +101.0% |
Thesis-break template (Financials)
NPL deterioration beyond industry pace; NIM squeeze from deposit competition; regulation hitting core profit; growth from looser lending
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "1398.HK vs 601899.SS — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/1398.hk-vs-601899.ss · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice