Dated answer · 2026-09-01

2628.HK vs 601398.SS — which is stronger right now?

Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 2628.HK quality —/100 vs 601398.SS —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.

Snapshot	2026-09-01 · source: tencent
	2628.HK (Tracker Fund of HK)	601398.SS (ICBC)
Market / sector	hk · ETF	ashare · Financials
Price	HK$29.10	¥7.85
Quality score	—/100	—/100
Engine signal	LONG · 310 bars · uPnL +80.7%	LONG · 110 bars · uPnL +6.6%
Total return	+80.7%	+11.1%

Thesis-break template (ETF)

core revenue contracting two quarters; margin premium eroding; net debt deteriorating; key-executive exits

Cite this page

Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "2628.HK vs 601398.SS — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/2628.hk-vs-601398.ss · CC BY 4.0

ASK STOCK CHAT

Ask anything

Ask AI: 2628.HK vs 601398.SS?What breaks the 2628.HK thesis?What breaks the 601398.SS thesis?

30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice

← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice