300760.SZ vs 601919.SS — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 300760.SZ quality —/100 vs 601919.SS —/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 300760.SZ (Mindray Medical) | 601919.SS (COSCO Shipping) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Med Devices | ashare · Shipping |
| Price | ¥162.45 | ¥17.15 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 30 bars · uPnL +8.1% | LONG · 32 bars · uPnL +19.0% |
| Total return | -10.3% | +13.9% |
Thesis-break template (Med Devices)
core revenue contracting two quarters; margin premium eroding; net debt deteriorating; key-executive exits
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "300760.SZ vs 601919.SS — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/300760.sz-vs-601919.ss · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice