600036.SS vs ITW — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 600036.SS quality —/100 vs ITW 100/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 600036.SS (China Merchants Bank) | ITW (Illinois Tool) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Financials | us · Industrials |
| Price | ¥39.63 | $281.67 |
| Quality score | —/100 | 100/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 29 bars · uPnL +4.2% | LONG · 307 bars · uPnL +13.8% |
| Total return | -12.7% | +13.8% |
Thesis-break template (Financials)
NPL deterioration beyond industry pace; NIM squeeze from deposit competition; regulation hitting core profit; growth from looser lending
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "600036.SS vs ITW — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/600036.ss-vs-itw · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice