600779.SS vs TMO — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 600779.SS quality —/100 vs TMO 100/100; engine WAIT vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 600779.SS (Shuijingfang) | TMO (Thermo Fisher) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Liquor | us · Healthcare |
| Price | ¥26.91 | $633.71 |
| Quality score | —/100 | 100/100 |
| Engine signal | WAIT · 64 bars · uPnL +0.0% | LONG · 43 bars · uPnL +25.3% |
| Total return | -48.2% | -6.0% |
Thesis-break template (Liquor)
core revenue contracting two quarters; margin premium eroding; net debt deteriorating; key-executive exits
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "600779.SS vs TMO — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/600779.ss-vs-tmo · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice