Which is safer: 601398.SS or 688981.SS?
Safety has three computed layers here: business quality (601398.SS —/100 vs 688981.SS —/100), signal maturity (110 vs 87 bars), and your position sizing — which only you control. We publish the pieces and the method, not a single verdict.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 601398.SS (ICBC) | 688981.SS (SMIC A-Shares) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Financials | ashare · Semis |
| Price | ¥7.85 | ¥125.81 |
| Quality score | —/100 | —/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 110 bars · uPnL +6.6% | LONG · 87 bars · uPnL +16.6% |
| Total return | +11.1% | +25.0% |
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "Which is safer: 601398.SS or 688981.SS?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/601398.ss-vs-688981.ss/q/601398.ss-or-688981.ss-safer · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← 601398.SS vs 688981.SS · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice