601398.SS vs SMH — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 601398.SS quality —/100 vs SMH 100/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 601398.SS (ICBC) | SMH (Semiconductor ETF) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Financials | us · ETF |
| Price | ¥7.85 | $555.77 |
| Quality score | —/100 | 100/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 110 bars · uPnL +6.6% | LONG · 308 bars · uPnL +120.8% |
| Total return | +11.1% | +120.8% |
Thesis-break template (Financials)
NPL deterioration beyond industry pace; NIM squeeze from deposit competition; regulation hitting core profit; growth from looser lending
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "601398.SS vs SMH — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/601398.ss-vs-smh · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice