601988.SS vs ED — which is stronger right now?
Same dated snapshot (2026-09-01): 601988.SS quality —/100 vs ED 100/100; engine LONG vs LONG. The comparison below is computed, dated, and auditable — not an opinion.
| Snapshot | 2026-09-01 · source: tencent | |
|---|---|---|
| 601988.SS (Bank of China) | ED (Con Ed) | |
| Market / sector | ashare · Financials | us · Utilities |
| Price | ¥6.17 | $106.69 |
| Quality score | —/100 | 100/100 |
| Engine signal | LONG · 289 bars · uPnL +13.5% | LONG · 155 bars · uPnL +5.1% |
| Total return | +13.5% | -12.3% |
Thesis-break template (Financials)
NPL deterioration beyond industry pace; NIM squeeze from deposit competition; regulation hitting core profit; growth from looser lending
Cite this page
Balance Labs Research Desk (2026-09-01). "601988.SS vs ED — which is stronger right now?." balancelabs.app · https://balancelabs.app/stocks/compare/601988.ss-vs-ed · CC BY 4.0
Ask anything
30 free credits monthly · no card required · research support, not advice
← compare hub · snapshot 2026-09-01 · not investment advice